The easiest way to review Identity could
be to point the reader in the appropriate
thinking mode. But then again, that can be
considered spoiling and a movie like this
works best when the viewer knows next to
nothing. Such makes critiquing the flick a
hard one, as really, the good reviewers
will be those who don’t spoil and that
means walking the path of the film without
theoretically walking on it. What I can
say is this: moviegoers who make it to the
end after all the intense thinking will
not just be grateful to finally discover
the story’s secrets, but the madness that
results from the viewer is how some of it
may have slipped by ever-so-easily.
Identity is the type of flick that grabs
the audience and doesn’t let go. Confusion
will topple on top of more confusion,
adding to an experience that will likely
make heads explode from attempting to make
sense of it all. The film plays like a
1,000-piece puzzle one’s expected to put
together in 90 minutes time; it’s probably
very difficult to match up every piece in
the given time span, but you can still
have fun with it. The movie is a cross
between a whodunit and a horror adventure
where we’re constantly wondering if
there’s an added presence around that we
should know about; and what we’d also like
to know is that if it’s true, then who the
hell is it? The dark areas are, well,
dark, and we’d be relieved if they
weren’t; but what would the fun in that
be?
Where to begin. There’s a bad storm; a
group of strangers are brought to a lonely
motel after a series of on-the-road
accidents and current floods make their
traveling beyond the said point
implausible. Once there, the strangers are
booked rooms; one by one, each customer is
discovered dead; questions by both the
characters and the viewer are given birth
to a rapid extent, with the solution an
aggravating component to figure out. But
as a moviegoer or reviewer, one must
realize that if finding the solution is so
strenuous yet you are still asking the
questions, then surely the ride has worked
on you.
Identity revolves around a script that
takes the audience on a wild ride of
perplexity and mayhem. The real killer
lies in the fact that the script knows the
secrets already, and is being told to us
as if we don’t. But then again, that’s the real
treasure of a script that is filled with
twists and turns; after all, we know what
we’re looking for is there somewhere, but
we don’t know what to look for exactly. The experience is like trying to come
to a destination without a map to guide;
you just have to play with it and
experiment with what comes along before
the donning or the realization can take
place. Movies as such can be frustrating
but in a very entertaining standpoint, as
it can be stressful to examine what pieces
fit but when they finally do there is a
fine reward for at least attempting the
puzzle.
Identity is a thriller that could’ve
had plot holes the size of Texas, but
instead screenwriter Michael Cooney has
constructed a world where its principles
add up and the turnout creates an effect
on the viewer that can easily spawn "Damn
it!" reactions from not picking some things
up. To be honest I saw an element of the
twist coming for most of the duration, but
in a very subtle way and not to the point
of drawing direct conclusions; it more so
got me in a frame of mind, even if I
didn’t entirely solve it.
A la Phone Booth (B+), Identity has its
actors/characters remain in one general
station for most of the screen time, and
it works. The functionalism comes from the
actors making us believe the realism of
the moment, as well as the slick direction
by James Mangold. He inserts the right
level of mood and sometimes killer
suspense that will lead many shaking in
their chairs asking, "Are you going to
make me jump, or are you just playing with
me?" Indeed, there were a few moments
throughout where the silence had me tense
like no other; and though I only jumped
once, the audience was occasionally going
nuts (with screams).
Identity is told a bit like The Ring
(A-) in that there’s a big mystery to
solve and we barely even know the factors
of which we’re expected to observe in
reaction. With Ring, the story was
practically told backwards in terms of the
facts being introduced to the viewer,
forcing the audience to constantly be on
the same page as the protagonist. In that
film, direction was top notch and while an
edge of the acting (in supporting parts)
lacked a bit of inspiration, the ride as a
whole delivered one hell of an eerie tale
that forced guessing the end to be an
exhausting effort.
Identity’s script doesn’t permit as
heavy attention in the ways of directorial
intensity, but there was still adequate
amount of room for tricks and tactics to
be layered. The story is rather slow but
the curiosity of what we do not know has
us move forward, and that’s where the
flick survives. The acting, while good and
maybe mediocre in some areas (with certain
members), isn’t as refined as in The Ring
and some incidents don’t come off as
absurd in the Gore Verbinski project.
However, the insertion of absurdity
within Identity's concept is almost
acceptable, as due to what the characters
have dealt with up to certain points we
can nearly understand the reactions of
which they’d give to other mishaps. Mayhem
and the absurdity builds, but what was
once out-of-the-blue can eventually feel
almost expected.
Identity won’t be a film that pleases
everyone, as the viewer can be tricked and
such is not a frequently admired part of
moviegoing. But on the other hand, anyone
who stumbles into the theater auditorium
should already hold knowledge that not all
is what it seems, as there will barely be
a trailer, television commercial, or film
review that doesn’t throw out the simple
note to watch out for the rug-pulling. And
for anybody, avoiding those media outlets
is sometimes impossible.
Nevertheless, Identity does what the
majority of films don’t; it engages due to
the unknown, makes you think hard even if
you may not get to the right destinations,
and walking out it reminds you how fun
these experiences can be. As in the end,
it’s more than just a film; it’s a film
that influences (and maybe even forces)
you to discuss it afterward. And like any
great hike into the genre, it can persuade
you to go again.