|
The Rules of
Attraction is not your average mainstream piece of filmmaking.
It is dark, it can be grimy, it can be disturbing, yet
we all know that the clips we are viewing are just a fraction
of what really goes on in the rest of the world with college
or even high school students nearly every weekend. What makes
Attraction so compelling to watch is not just the realistic
point-of-view of the sex and drugs lives of these college
roommates, but the awesome style director Roger Avary inserts
into every scene, the nearly flawless performances from
everybody on-camera, three-dimensional characters who feel
very real, subjects at bat that can be happening right next
door, stunning cinematography and a very groovy
soundtrack. It all adds up to one hell of a film that has you
walk out pondering about the so-many flicks in the marketplace
that fail to reach this level of magnificent filmmaking. I
was really astonished by how much I was engaged into this
film's situations, as it sucked me in from the opening bit and
refused to release its pressure until the "God-all-mighty!!"
teasing finale. Rules of Attraction wastes no time in getting
to its point, and that is one of its benefits. Not only that,
but it sticks true to the film's mood and tone throughout the
entire duration of the feature, making every clip substantial
to our viewing experience. In other words, nothing presented
is there for pointless reasons. And when a movie can pull this
method off with the gold as such, it needs to be given a huge
applause.
I never did see Varsity Blues, but I can imagine the acting
there was far from grand. In Attraction, James Van Der Beek
challenges himself in a role that requires a lot from the
actor, as he not only has to maintain his charming charisma
that he is so used to showcasing, but the character's emotions
are so wide that with the improper casting of the part, the
film would not come off with the equal effect. The star really
amazed me with his performance, as it ranks up with Mel Gibson
(Signs) and Kieran Culkin (Igby Goes Down) as one of the best
leading deliveries of the year.
His role is somewhat in the same department as Tom Cruise
in Vanilla Sky, where the beginning portion of that film works
off Cruise's easy charm and usual grin yet has to face the
obstacle of having a mask cover all that eventually - forcing
the actor to create the sparks through actual acting. Van Der
Beek is every sixteen-year old girl's sweetheart and while his
role does ask him to use his traditional personality at times,
the part for the most part demands him to step away from how
many people perceive the actor and deliver something truly
dark...yet, we love it.
The actor has this creepy yet awesome ability to give a
dark stare that comes off a little bit like Jack Nicholson
from The Shining. But here, what doesn't have Attraction
insult Kubrick's creation is that it executes itself
marvelously. Besides my adoration for these trances Van Der
Beek would get into, he's the character most Hollywood
screenwriters are afraid to write about for fear of getting
too deep into the MPAA limits and being harsh to the
audience's overall view of a star. Roger Avary goes the whole
nine yards with his character analysis of Sean Bateman (Beek)
and isn't the least bit terrified of the results come exit
polls. But the filmmaker pulls his approach so nicely that it
can elevate your general perception of James Van Der Beek as
an actual actor (much like Adam Sandler in Punch-Drunk Love). It's really a breakthrough performance for
him, as it forces the actor to what he normally isn't prepared
to do - act.
Sean is basically a sex-driven drug addict with his main
mind-set on which girl he will get laid to that night and what
alternative plans he has outside of that (partially pointed
toward weed). In some rather humorous scenes, we actually get
to see the character mentally go through all his nightly
options which just adds to the trip. I can see why some
filmgoers would label Rules of Attraction as a sort of
loose, unfocused film with no real conflicts and a weak story.
But really, the story's conflicts and story involve each
character's dilemmas and the issues they run into that we get
wrapped around. And at least for myself, I was
hooked into just about every personality's problems which
added to the sympathy level. It was as if Avary had placed a
camera in a party dorm and let the record button just go, and
this was his results.
Shannyn Sossamon has been an up-and-coming actress since
starring in A Knight's Tale and further proved her on-screen
personality in 40 Days & 40 Nights. In Rules of Attraction,
the actress pretty much plays the same role as 40 Days except
a bit darker and more honest in tone. She has the delightful
smile and on-screen presence to like her at-first-sight, but
what allows her character to be deeper in context is Roger
Avary's commitment in making her role very realistic. She
feels very human and her performance almost feels as if she's
just right at home with this role and not having a whole lot
of trouble transforming into the mind-set. Perhaps some of the
cast members did some research into the college party lives or
just went off their own past experience from the good 'ol
days, but the film's truthful portrayal of behavior is one of
Rules of Attraction's most strongest elements to its game.
Ian Somerhalder as Paul Denton really comes through with a
very convincing portrayal of a gay student obsessed with Sean
Bateman, and cannot see his life without Sean in the picture.
The actor plays a straight-out "pretty boy" who finds
attraction for straight guys, but doesn't seem to be going all
too well with this path. In what is stylistically a very nifty
part, in one particular scene (some people may find it
uncomfortable) Paul and Sean are in the same room (of which
Paul hoped to play some tricks) and director Roger Avary
displays the actual reality of the situation at the same time
as showing the imagination of Paul at the time (split-screen).
And with the supporting music attached, while possibly awkward
for some - direction wise the scene sells. A lot of Rules of
Attraction is extreme style, but where the film goes right is
delivering a whole batch of context beneath its flair. This
could have been style-over-substance in filmmaking, but Avary
makes sure not to fall into the trap that some people labeled
From Hell as.
From the WB sitcom, 7th Heaven, Jessica Biel not
only does a nice job of being attractive in this role (when is
she not...) but convinces the viewer of the character's (Lara)
absolutely slutty nature that almost makes us want to slap her
at times. Lara will sleep with just about anyone, but even
though her overall personality is a little shallow in terms of
the screenwriting - that's the exact point. She is not an
intellectual and is not very deep in context internally, but
that's exactly who she is. Lara does not look for a real
relationship but just fools around with one night stands with
other guys who are just like her. She is also not afraid to
hurt feelings or play twists with friends or acquaintances,
which forces the audience at a time or two to just want to
sock her. At a scene in which something actually does happen,
I was left with no choice but to add in to the light applause
that resulted from the crowd.
In what was a character I was almost screaming for more
screen time, Russell Sams gives Richard "Dick" Jared one of
the most fun performances out of the bag. The star is only
seen briefly, but absolutely steals the moments with his
over-the-top goofiness that had me chuckling along beyond
belief with his weird yet extremely comical nature. Richard is
implied to be an old boyfriend of Paul Denton's and when
"Dick" drops in for a visit, it leads to a hilarious dinner
table scene with the two and their mothers (Faye Dunaway and
Swoosie Kurts). Words cannot describe the scene but is one
blast to sit through, and I evidently wasn't alone opening
night as you could just feel that the audience was on the
verge of breaking out in applause at Richard's hysterical
departure. This is his second film and I hope the actor does
not quit here with comedic roles.
Playing Victor Johnson, Kip Pardue gives a very direct and
honest delivery as the guy Lauren is waiting to hook up with
(they are three-thousand miles apart and had dated before).
Victor is her ideal boyfriend and just cannot wait for an
opportunity for the two to reunite in a relationship that was
broken off by the long-distance factor. Kip Pardue has never
been in a solid role until now, and in Rules of Attraction the
star supplies what is a very suave performance. In a long
sequence where the audience gets taken a fast-paced, front-row
view to Victor's Europe trip in fast-forward motion, the actor
narrates with rapid talk and style that it is just an honor to
be in the presence of the technique Roger Avary has
established. We don't get too much of the character, but the
way in which Avary compares and contrasts how Lauren perceives
Victor to be and the reality of the actual scenario via the
long extremely cool Europe sequence - it just sends an almost
authentic gaze on how many people are versus what we may
imagine in our heads. Not an Oscar-worthy performance, but
definitely a breakthrough for someone who was mediocre at best
in the Renny Harlin flick, Driven. While I loved Rules of
Attraction to pieces, I have a few minor complaints that do in
fact pull this film away from the absolutely "classic"
category I almost branded it as in my initial viewing. One
flaw being where one of the character's deaths is played out
in a manner where it is hoping to withdraw a very deep
reaction from the viewer. While we care because the person is
in fact killing themselves through a very painful and
uneasy-for-the-viewer method, there's a certain level of
attachment that is just not present to the point where we are
deeply crying for the loss we are presented with. This
character is barely seen throughout the duration of the film,
so we never really know who they are as a person but it is
more so implied of their internal feelings and overall
depressed emotional state. So when the suicide scene actually
arrives, we do experience a sense of sadness that is superbly
supported by "Without You" in the background, but this
internal reaction from our part only really occurs considering
the method of which the character is committing suicide
through. We have no emotional attachment to the individual and
that's where a minor flaw kicks in. To us the character is
just a face we saw earlier in the story and someone who was
never given beneficial time to build an actual personality
worth actually caring for to a profound extent. Another
flaw, while extremely minor, deals with an element that I've
always found intriguing just with the considerable range of
this act I've previously seen pulled off. This deals with the
task of having a character drive a vehicle on the road and
make it seem as if they are actually the ones driving. In one
specific scene, Van Der Beek is driving along with another
passenger in the car, but through his rather long periods of
time where he stares at his buddy next to him, it's just very
implausible that he's actually the one behind-the-wheel. I've
always had the state-of-mind that a great actor can not only
transform into an entirely different persona, but even in the
most simplest situations - make the viewer completely believe
they are really there and force the audience to ponder for
themselves whether the characters are in fact driving or if
it's just terrific acting with the filmmakers themselves the
ones driving. Or if it is a blue-screen, influence the
audience in truly believing there is no magical trick behind
the scene. It's like that mistake many television shows fall
into with their very fake on-the-road segments where the
characters are evidently with a blue-screen surrounding them.
But not only that, but their hands are constantly moving the
steering wheel back-and-forth attempting to make it seem as if
they are driving. But what the hell are the chances of having
to move your steering wheel in the exact same positions
constantly on a road? Minor factor? Hell yes, but the subtlest
scenarios are one of the best ways to convey truly outstanding
acting. An actor's job is to have its viewer be convinced of
every aspect that's unfolding in front of them, and not just
within their dialogue; acting involves just about every subtle
detail. As a whole, Rules of Attraction is a cross between
American Pie and quite possibly American Psycho. It's the
hardcore and too-honest version Pie was terrified of being but
not exactly as downright f***ed up as Psycho. It's not exactly
made for the Dawson's Creek audience but even may be
too darkly told for the AP audience. Attraction is definitely
not a mainstream release and after seeing the film, I
understand why it barely did any business in its just modest
theater count opening weekend (despite seeing it with fairly
filled attendance). It's a more alive tale of sex and drugs
among young adults and boasts a filmmaking skill that is just
about superb. Both American Pie films managed to secure a fun
ride and somewhat of a truthful take on the first summer back
from college. But where Rules of Attraction makes its run for
the money is that it does what most teen oriented films never
ever attempt to do - make a movie of extreme quality and not
just an overall good 'ol time at the movies. In the case of
this release, its audience didn't have a very clear picture
that this was what the ride would amount to but it's exactly
what the situation looks like. Perhaps its business is due to
the rather mediocre advertising Lions Gate gave the
production, I'm not sure, but what I do know is that Rules of
Attraction is an absolutely outstanding film many are
avoiding. It almost has that feel of one of those cult
releases that doesn't get discovered till the shelves or until
friends convince other buddies that it's a worth a look (I was
recently forced down to watch Bubble Boy and was dearly
surprised to find it one mindless fun movie). I've seen
Attraction twice, with the second viewing at a theater which
occasionally offers Fri/Sat midnight shows of flicks that have
been long gone from theaters but discovered as more of a cult
hit on video (Army of Darkness has been shown their before).
It's either a coincidence or the theater manager's absolute
intent, as Rules of Attraction (at least to me) feels like
that one cult film that some theaters in the distant future
may be offering at midnight for the fans that discovered the
movie through whatever sources. Rules of Attraction is a
daring and bold film that can be disturbing at moments, but
when looked upon in terms of its direction, script, acting,
chemistry, and musical score, the movie is a triumph in
developing a college-centered storyline to the sincere point
where these are not just characters out of a surreal story,
but actual humans coping with actual dilemmas and issues. Not
quite a masterpiece (almost), but Rules of Attraction is one
hell of a surprise that should not be avoided. For those of
you who've seen it and loved it, spread on the word so this
flick can blossom even if it doesn't occur on the big-screen. Grade: A |