$8.99
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery Monday, May 20 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest delivery Saturday, May 18. Order within 10 hrs 35 mins
In Stock
$$8.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$8.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon.com
Ships from
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Returns
30-day easy returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more

2010: The Year We Make Contact [Blu-ray]

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 5,805 ratings
IMDb6.7/10.0
Amazon's Choice highlights highly rated, well-priced products available to ship immediately.
Amazon's Choice

$8.99
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE Returns
Additional Multi-Format options Edition Discs
Price
New from Used from
Multi-Format
April 7, 2009
1
$8.99
$7.38 $2.54
Watch Instantly with Rent Buy
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$8.99","priceAmount":8.99,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"8","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"DJ%2FOL7q%2FhJJW6gSsKGcY1JKb0Fru5yMwanBiNuoA3KeTWO8fGSlj%2FPzi1JE49g6rJFAEngbq9J2ojNgHobcBiFZRwexph18uNqCS4PGLS3Z7iQCQ4E3OVJepzT53kHPZAtghIatBnHk%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

Genre Fantasy, Science Fiction
Format Multiple Formats, Blu-ray, Color, NTSC
Contributor Arthur C. Clarke, Madolyn Smith, Douglas Rain, John Lithgow, Herta Ware, James McEachin, Taliesin Jaffe, Roy Scheider, Keir Dullea, Elya Baskin, Mary Jo Deschanel, Bob Balaban, Peter Hyams, Helen Mirren, Dana Elcar, Savely Kramarov, Candice Bergen See more
Initial release date 2009-04-07
Language English, Spanish, French, Italian, German, Portuguese
Available at a lower price from other sellers that may not offer free Prime shipping.

Frequently bought together

$8.99
Get it as soon as Monday, May 20
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$20.99
Get it as soon as Monday, May 20
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$20.00
Get it May 22 - 23
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Please Rewind.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers.
Choose items to buy together.

From the manufacturer

1
1

Warner Bros. Home Entertainment

A division of WarnerMedia, Warner Bros. Home Entertainment (WBHE) brings together all of Warner Bros.’ businesses involved in the delivery of home entertainment content to consumers.

Based on the constantly changing ways by which consumers access entertainment, WBHE focuses on maximizing current and next-generation distribution scenarios to make the Studio’s content available to audiences through as many channels, platforms and devices as possible.

1

Warner Home Video

With distribution in 90 international territories, Warner Home Video has one of the largest distribution infrastructures in the global video marketplace. In 2019, Warner Home Video had 20% marketshare for overall home entertainment WHV also had the library with “Harry Potter Complete 8-Film Collection” and the television franchise with “Game of Thrones.”

1

Product Description

2010: The Year We Make Contact (BD)

A new time, a new odyssey, a new chance to confront enigmas arising from the daring Jupiter mission of 2001. Crew members aboard the Leonov will rendezvous with the still-orbiting Discovery. And their fate will rest on the silicon shoulders of the computer they reawaken, HAL-9000. Based on Arthur C. Clarkes 2001: A Space Odyssey sequel, director Peter Hyams spellbinder nominated for 5 Academy Awards* stars Roy Scheider, John Lithgow, Oscar winner** Helen Mirren, Bob Balaban and Keir Dullea.

]]>

Product details

  • Aspect Ratio ‏ : ‎ 2.40:1
  • Is Discontinued By Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ No
  • MPAA rating ‏ : ‎ PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
  • Product Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.31 x 6.81 x 0.55 inches; 1.98 ounces
  • Item model number ‏ : ‎ 883929051069
  • Director ‏ : ‎ Peter Hyams
  • Media Format ‏ : ‎ Multiple Formats, Blu-ray, Color, NTSC
  • Run time ‏ : ‎ 1 hour and 56 minutes
  • Release date ‏ : ‎ April 7, 2009
  • Actors ‏ : ‎ Douglas Rain, Roy Scheider, Candice Bergen, John Lithgow, Helen Mirren
  • Dubbed: ‏ : ‎ Spanish
  • Subtitles: ‏ : ‎ English, Spanish, French, Italian, German, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Finnish
  • Producers ‏ : ‎ Peter Hyams
  • Studio ‏ : ‎ Warner Home Video
  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B001993Y1S
  • Writers ‏ : ‎ Peter Hyams
  • Country of Origin ‏ : ‎ USA
  • Number of discs ‏ : ‎ 1
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 5,805 ratings

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
5,805 global ratings
2010: The Year We Make Contact - A Sequel Without Kubrick
4 Stars
2010: The Year We Make Contact - A Sequel Without Kubrick
2001: A Space Odyssey is a film classic that I only in recent years was able to wrap my head around after the 3rd viewing in my lifetime. So it makes sense that it would take me awhile to get around to this sequel that came almost 15 years after the original. What I found interesting about it right off the bat is that just without Stanley Kubrick, the tone of the film changes drastically. 2010 does a lot of things right, but exists in a Monolith sized shadow that is hard to ignore. What it has though is a cast of great actors and a really interesting concept... what if they went back?Being that I've watched both films well after their original release, I have a unique perspective on the reason for the film or maybe it's intentions. Clearly, there are several sequels to the original book that the 2001 film was based on, but at the time of release space movies were catching on fire in the theaters. Things that resembled hits like Star Wars in the theaters and Star Trek from television, were all the rage and movies like Alien were finding themselves audiences. It may just be me, but I felt a lot of Alien influence in this film with the plot being similar and the portrayal of the ship(s). The crew going back to a puzzling, lost ship in space to see what happened on an expedition of course reminded me of the simple concept behind Alien and many other space thrillers, "what if they go back?"Without Kubrick, I felt that the space sequences inside of the spaceships really lacked the style or polish that 2001 had. There was something magical in the way that scenes were constructed in the original, to where all of the interior sequences in 2010 seem styled after Alien. The all-white interior no longer had the shine of 2001, but the dark, ominous feeling of trouble in space. It's a standard science fiction plot, but 2010 benefits from being the successor to one of film's all-time classics. These movies were like the Interstellar of old, where they really tried to tackle existential concepts by using space as the backdrop of the human experience. 2001 does so by plotting a human against a robot, and 2010 does so in pitting many of them against artificial intelligence in the final frontier.Roy Scheider stars as the captain of the ship, who has to go back to see what happened to the original crew. "My God, it's full of stars" is the communication he listens to over and over, wondering what it is in space that he is searching for. I found it funny that I knew of him as a captain of a boat that hunts a giant shark in Jaws, and here he is captaining a crew to hunt the lost voyage of a prior expedition in space. Helen Mirren plays a Russian crewmate which is where the politics of the space race is also tied into the story, showing its age and also reasons for popularity or release in the 80s.2010 also stars a young John Lithgow who has quite possibly one of the worst scenes that I think I've ever seen in a film, due to no fault of his I'd hope. In a sequence where he goes out into space with another crewmate, he cannot breathe normally as instructed by the captain. He starts breathing really shallow and at a rapid pace, which for some reason someone on the film thought would be best laid out to play over the entire scene and every other one that is cut into it. It becomes quite irritating to listen to what sounds like a panting dog for nearly 10 minutes, but otherwise the film is really well-crafted for the time.Overall, this is a pretty good sequel and entry into the science fiction genre. It's not for everyone, but I'd say it largely benefits from the classic film before it by giving it very significant context. Otherwise, it's a fairly standard film that you see the likes of still today and doesn't particularly hold up in any particular way. If you're interested in continuing your voyage after Kubrick's 2001 or are going through the discography of many of this film's great actors, this film is worth watching for the right price. I definitely want to read the books now seeing how this story has continued and added even more thought-provoking concepts.Case came in great condition with a Blu-ray disc that contains only 1 very dated behind-the-scenes Special Feature.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2022
2010 is the follow-up to the classic film directed by Stanley Kubrick, 2001. It was made during the cold war, so it capitalized on the US vs. Russia conflict of that time. The premise is that both the US and Russia are preparing missions to go to Jupiter to investigate what happened to the Discovery spacecraft, during its failed 2001 mission. When it is learned that the Discovery is going to crash into Jupiter's moon Io, a team of Americans, including Dr. Haywood (played in a recast role by Roy Scheider (replacing William Sylvester)) who was the Earth-based head of the original Discovery mission, the Discovery ship designer Walter Curnow (played by John Lithgow), and the programmer of the HAL 9000 (which seemingly went crazy in 2001), Dr. Chandra, played by Bob Balaban. The movie also stars Helen Mirren as the commander of the Russian ship and includes the nearly ageless Keir Dullea and Douglas Rain reprising their roles as Dave and the voice of HAL from the first movie.

The movie was made during the height of both the cold war and the tail end of the space race, and both of those themes are prevalent throughout. The movie pays homage to but has a much different feel than 2001. That is due in large part because it was made about sixteen years after the original film, but also because the director Peter Hyams did not try to copy Kubrick's style and tone. Personally, I like this movie more than I do 2001, both when I was a kid and as an adult. There is a lot more suspense that is mixed throughout the movie, not just packed in at the end. And, since it has a much shorter running time, it does not feel like it goes on and on as 2001 does.

For those who get the Blu-Ray, it does not really have any extras. Just the movie. The A/V quality is okay, but it definitely did not get a major restoration, certainly not approaching anything like what 2001 received with its 4k UHD transfer. That said, I have never seen the movie on any of the major streaming services, so if you want to watch it physical discs seem to be the easiest way to do so.

Overall, the movie presents a good conclusion to the story. It explains the events from the first movie and gives audiences a hopeful ending. There were other books written that continued the story from here, but it is unlikely that they will ever be adapted into a movie after all this time. I think most people who will consider getting this will be people who either saw it in the theater or on TV back in the 80s. But, if you are one who only recently discovered the movie 2001 and are trying to decide whether to get this, I would say it is worth watching. I cannot guarantee you will like it as much as 2001 (assuming you liked or loved that one), but I think it is worth watching just to get the entire story. And, if you were lukewarm to the original movie, this is definitely worth giving a chance to because, as I said above, it does have a much different feel than the first movie did.
3 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2024
Item works for what it was intended for. No apparent design flaws and weaknesses observed.
Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2010
I was pretty upset when I discovered that my DVD copy of 2010 wasn't anamorphic... so I would have been happy just to find a DVD in anamorphic. But I decided to upgrade to blu-ray for this disk, since I remembered it from the theater as being pretty visually impressive.

I read a number of reviews on here. I have noticed that Amazon has taken to "clustering" reviews recently... so the reviews for Blu-ray, DVD, or even VHS are all together. This is DUMB, but it's what they do these days. Oh well... In this case, the review is for the USA release of 2010 on Blu-ray (not the Canada release, as some of my other Amazon purchases have turned out to be lately!).

I've just finished watching it. And I watched it, and listened to it, EXPECTING to see the issues that some folks mentioned here (bad image quality, artifacts, etc). So I'm pleased to say that on the BD I received, there was NONE of that. It's a very nice transfer.

Granted, the master has a lot of grain, and there are some minor scratches which can be noticed on rare occasion. But it still looks really nice. Short of doing a "frame-by-frame restoration" (as was done on the James Bond disks a few years ago) where colors are corrected to compensate for fading (NOT an issue on this print by the way), scratches are digitally "painted out" and so forth... I doubt that this could look much better.

Of course, the criticisms about the SFX sequences are... well, utter nonsense. Yes, there are some minimal visual artifacts that inevitably exist on ANY film that was made in the days when filmmaking was optical in nature. Somehow, I was expecting (based upon some of the reviews of the blu-ray) that these would be jarring in HD. But they weren't. The film looks very, very good.

I've also noted the criticisms of the film itself. Well, as others have stated... this is NOT 2001. Nor was it intended to be. Personally, I like this film a lot more than I like 2001. 2001 is "higher art" but it's less "watchable" and that's what I care about when I'm watching entertainment.

It's a fun film. Clarke was involved, very much so, in the making of the film, by the way, and despite claims to the contrary by some would-be "urban mythmakers" he never "forswore" this film. No, he always spoke of it fondly, at least in all of his public commentary. He even went so far as to say that there were elements in the film which he wished he'd included in his earlier novel. So ENOUGH with the "Clarke would have hated it" nonsense, OK?

The design of the film is classic Syd Mead, except for the re-used design elements from 2001, of course. Mead's individual setpieces on the Leonov were beautifully done, as was his design for the Leonov itself.

Sadly, there were flaws in the execution of these designs.

The Leonov's rotational section should have all of the "modules" set up so that they are normal to the radius of rotation, but there two angled modules per "arm" which are not normal to this... so the floors of these sections would be, effectively, on a 30-degree slant. I blame this on the model-makers, not on the designer... but it happens.

More significant was the fact that all of the "setpieces" on the ships were built in a soundstage, as complete "uninterrupted" floorplans. This is, of course, nonsense... but would not have been a significant issue except for a pair of "long, walking" shots aboard both vessels which simply wouldn't fit into the ship designs. Most viewers will never notice this sort of thing, but to me, it's a huge issue.

Finally, a lot of criticism is placed on the film for not having the shots which should be in zero-g be in actual zero-g. Of course, considering that the film was shot on the planet Earth, not in deep space, it would be pretty difficult to get the shots in true zero-g, wouldn't it? It would be tremendously expensive, and would make for a lot of distraction from the storytelling for the average viewer (just like it was for viewers of 2001!) I would have preferred that the actors, and the director, had remained more aware of this during filming, but it's a minor quibble that doesn't really interfere with the storytelling.

All together, this is a fine, enjoyable film which has (for the most part) withstood the test of time. The anachronisms - Pan Am, the USSR/USA "cold war," etc, etc... are minor concerns, but remember, this film (and its predecessor) specifically didn't use NASA but instead NCA as the national space agency (and NASA existed at the time, so this clearly was by design). So you can think of this as a "parallel world" to the one we live in, and you can enjoy the film just fine on that basis.

Overall, this BD was much higher quality than what I'd been expecting from the reviews, and I'm totally satisfied with it.
8 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2024
Always liked this movie and just decided to watch it again uninterupted. I liked the artistry of 2001, but the story has always been subjected to a lot of interpretation. This movie resolves all of that in a surprising and a little unsettling manner. There’s a theory about why we’ve never been contacted if other life is out there. All civilizations reach the point where the use of their technology threatens their existence. The vast majority fail and just aren’t out there anymore.
Reviewed in the United States on March 9, 2024
It’s full of stars. Chief Brody really delivers in this sci fi epic. Always a great watch
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2024
This was packaged well, and also played good!

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Rob Powers
5.0 out of 5 stars The Monolith Returns
Reviewed in Canada on May 3, 2024
Practical follow-up to 2001 A Space Odyssey. Roy Scheider leads US crew as Helen Mirren leads Russian crew. On the same Russian craft they head to the Discovery and Hal-9000 for answers. Only this time something else is there. Great suspense as the mysteries deepen. And then Keir Dullea appears...
七味
5.0 out of 5 stars 相手が悪い
Reviewed in Japan on April 2, 2024
なにせ天才キューブリックの続編だから評価が低くて当たり前。
しかしロイ.シャイダー、オタクなので問題なし。
Stuart Dall
5.0 out of 5 stars Best Version
Reviewed in Australia on October 2, 2020
Totally underrated movie - can't be compared to 2001 of course ... regardless, this movie presents it's own messages and the presentation is carried by an interesting combination of a more-than-capable ensemble cast.
The disc is excellent quality and, after so many years, *this* is the correct widescreen ratio.

Buy it. Enjoy it.
One person found this helpful
Report
Ingo
5.0 out of 5 stars 2010 keine schlechte Blu-ray, kein schlechter Film !
Reviewed in Germany on March 9, 2010
Ich besaß schon seit längerer Zeit die DVD von 2001 und 2010.
Während man bei 2001 (einen doch sehr alten Film) voll auf seine Kosten kam (Bild-wie neu,Ton 1A, 16:9 anamorph), wurde es einem bei dem unbeschreiblich schlechten Transfer von 2010 (flimmern, zu dunkel- Monolit nicht sichtbar, letterbox) einfach nur schlecht.
All den "lieben" Leuten ("...Blu-ray-Version nicht besser als VHS....") sei nun gesagt:
Die Blu-ray-Version ist natürlich nicht perfekt aber qualitativ doch um Lichtjahre vom DVD-Transfer entfernt und zwar zum Besseren.
Hier wurde erstmals gescannt - nicht einfach abgefilmt, hier wurde z.B. an der Helligkeit und Farbe nachgearbeitet. Es sei zwar erwähnt, daß die Blu-ray von 2010 leider noch immer nicht die Bildqualität von 2001 erreicht, was wahrscheinlich daran liegt, daß hier zwar neu gescannt und gemastert wurde, aber eben nicht wie bei 2001 ein über die Maßen teurer Bild für Bild-remaster gemacht wurde, was man aber jetzt bei den Blu-rayversionen akzeptieren kann, da es sich immerhin bei 2001 um den Kultklassiker handelt.
Zum Film muß ich für all diese netten Leute anmerken, die 2010 als sooo schlecht deklarieren:
Ich liebe beide Filme in Kombination, was, so finde ich die Story komplettiert als einen Gesamtfilm.
Und bevor Ihr mich jetzt auch gleich zerfleischt: Der "...dämliche, armselige Kalte Krieg - Unsinn..." der da eingebaut wurde, war zu der Zeit als der Film gemacht wurde zu 100% aktuell and in Fortführung der damaligen Situation perfekt erdacht für 2010. Wenn ihr euch heute darüber beschwert, dann dürft ihr euch auch nicht 2001 anschauen, denn wie wir alle wissen ist 2001 auch etwas anders gekommen, als es im Film dargestellt wurde, und ach übrigens auch in 2001 kam der kalte Krieg indirekt vor.
Über den Film 2001 (den ich wohlgemerkt auch sehr schätze) sei euch mal allen gesagt, daß der Film in einigen Belangen ( Tricktechnik, Musik, u.a.) zwar ein Meisterwerk darstellt, aber in anderen Gebieten eben auch nicht. Er mag zwar heute Kult sein, aber wenn man erst das Buch lesen muß, welches ja durchaus dem Film zu Grunde liegt, um das Filmende zu verstehen, dann hat irgendwie, der Regisseur der die Geschichte inszeniert hat versagt. Es tut mir sehr leid euch edlen über die Maßen hochstehenden unirdischen Wesen, deren Denken alles zu sprengen scheint (zumindest scheint ihr das zu glauben) zu enttäuschen, aber Mr. Kubricks hat zwar "Kult" geschaffen aber bei 2001 auch etwas "versagt". Steigt man aber vom Hohen Roß der Gehirnakrobatik nur ein klein wenig runter und sieht sich beide Filme mit offenem Geist und Herzen, in Kombination als einen Gesamtfilm an, dann erhält man eine absolut perfekte Story mit Anfang und Ende, viel Raum zum wirklichen Nachdenken über Gott, Mystisches, und Jenseitiges und am Ende hat man wirklich ein größeres, erweitertes Bewußtsein, welches, so nehme ich an, auch Kubrick ursprünglich dem Publikum vermitteln wollte. Fazit: 2001 & 2010 (Gesamtfilm) ist, aus meiner Sicht die beste Variante um beide Filme zu beurteilen und der Regisseur von 2010 hat großartige Arbeit geleistet um an 2001 einen eben auch nicht perfekten Film anzuknüpfen und diesen zu komplettieren.

Soviel zur Ehrenrettung von 2010 und dessen Regisseurs und der Blu-ray-Version.
(Danke, und jetzt dürfen mich die "perfekten" 2001-Fanatiker zerfleischen)
42 people found this helpful
Report
やまさん
4.0 out of 5 stars 宇宙からの警告
Reviewed in Japan on April 27, 2024
宇宙にしろ地球でも平和が一番