The film raked in a thunderous $24.9
million in first day receipts, averaging a
monstrous $6,798 per-screen. The figure,
while well below the $31.2 million
first-day tally of X2, and far from the
$39.4 million gross of Spider-Man (the
movie the studio was obviously trying to
replicate), is still in line with various
big-budgeted Universal releases.In
comparison, the studio’s Mummy Returns
grabbed $68.1 million after a $23.4
million (first-day) start-up, while even
Jurassic Park: The Lost World gave in to
$21.6 million and $72.1 million over the
weekend frame. Take into account, however,
that the Jurassic Park sequel debuted over
Memorial Day when Sunday is traditionally
higher than usual.
Hulk’s figure boosted past Universal’s
Jurassic Park III as well, which also
opened in midsummer and had garnered $19.8
million on its opening day, despite being
a Wednesday. If second day sale returns
prove to be successful (as in, not
declining), Hulk should be in line to
retrieve somewhere in the vicinity of The
Mummy Returns, with the $70 million mark
relying pretty heavily on the flick’s
second day business. Being a pent-up comic
book flick, the film’s biggest fans were
likely to raid theaters on opening night,
thus possibly limiting the gross in its
following days, however slight.
Whether $70 million or not, with a
production budget lurking in the $130
million range, Universal should still make
a solid bank (between domestic and
international sales). With teens (and even
young kids) off for summer now, midweek
dailies should be helpful, but with such a
comic book release, hold-ups in the coming
weeks may not be all that sturdy. Though a
$150 million (total) should be fairly in
the bag unless the flick rakes in the
Daredevil (quality) reception among fans,
$200 million should be somewhat out of
reach, as most of its dedicated fans will
have likely taken the voyage either on
opening night or by the sunset of Sunday.
Hulk’s nemesis, Mummy Returns, lured in
$202.0 million in the long run
domestically, a figure of which the green
monster could struggle to overcome. Mummy
also had the benefit of being the first
big action event of the summer in 2001, as
well as solid word of mouth among
moviegoers.
Despite Kate Hudson being the Reese
Witherspoon of the year so far, her new
cutesy romantic comedy, Alex & Emma,
alongside Luke Wilson, turned in rather
modest/slow sales in first day returns.
The Rob Reinder-helmed flick took in $2.4
million on Friday, averaging $1,024
per-screen. Though Warner Bros. seemed to
nail television commercial spots steadily
nearing the film’s debut, the company
failed to ignite the same level of a
(movie theater) campaign as the cheery How
to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, which Paramount
marketed (via trailers) just about
beautifully.
With Hudson’s adorable charisma in Lose
a Guy’s ads, the film sparked significant
appeal among its core audience of young
females, along with offering a story that
couldn’t be any simpler yet couldn’t be
any more ideal for its primary audience.
That film grossed $23.8 million in debut
(after a $7.9 million first night reception
earlier this year), a figure that Alex &
Emma might not even achieve in its entire
run; with summer now in the air, however,
Alex’s midweek dailies could assist in
accomplishing that destination.
Although Luke Wilson has proven to be a
bankable actor this year with the college
comedic success, Old School, his presence
in the original Legally Blonde film didn’t
seem to boost his star-power up too many
levels with the female demographics.
Wilson, the brother of Owen, is a familiar
face that most people know, but despite
the promising duo here, audiences look to
have avoided what had given the impression
of a standard When Harry Met Sally
copycat.
Even though cliché and predictable
romances are just about all its core
demographic screams for these days, Alex &
Emma’s ads have never spoken out too
deeply to its would-be fans. The film’s
premise, which revolves around Wilson’s
character as a writer fascinated by the
directions of which a story can go, is not
exactly the perfect image of a date film.
But Hudson’s role, which partially
involves taking the position of Wilson’s
story’s roles in a cutesy fashion, had the
potential to make best friends with female
members of the crowd, only to resort to
material that really just did not look
overly unique.
Despite WB attaching on the obvious
tagline, "From Rob Reiner, director of
‘When Harry Met Sally’" in promotional
clips, moviegoers didn’t take the bite,
which could possibly result in the flick
landing slightly under $7 million for the
3-day frame (or slightly over). That
tagline may have also hurt Emma’s
prosperity chances; with the stories’
obvious similarities being thrown right in
front of audiences, along with the fact
that most people know who Reiner is
without having to be reminded of Sally, WB
may have given the wrong illusion via
their marketing strategy.
With How to Lose a Guy, female fans
very well knew it was yet another remake
of all the genre films that had come
before it, yet Paramount went full steam,
avoiding taglines that would give the
image of desperation.
Alex & Emma came within the same
perimeters as Paramount’s Matthew
Perry/Elizabeth Hurley comedy, Serving
Sara, which took in $2.0 million in first
day sales and $5.8 million over its 3-day
weekend late summer of last year. Alex
also reached the same terrain as this
year’s box office disappointment, Down
with Love, which conquered just $7.1
million in debut even after an explosive
exclusive debut in New York one week prior
to its national premiere.
Coincidentally, Love and Emma came off
like two extremely familiar films of which
their studios did not spice up with
delicious enough promises in ads (they may
not have been able to regardless);
consequently, their performances are
suffering.