She’s everywhere promoting her
latest CD, talking about her relationship with a certain
Oscar-winning actor, promoting her perfume (Glow), running her
restaurant, and now promoting her new movie, Maid in
Manhattan, co-starring Ralph Fiennes. If you are at all
concerned with pop culture, you cannot escape her; she’s
everywhere, a tribute more to her publicist and her own
ambition than her actual talents as an actress or singer (at
least in my opinion). Lost in all the publicity and hype is
the fact that she’s an average singer (at best) and an actress
who’s shown potential for greatness (Selena, Out of Sight),
but in most of her movies she’s proven to be an equally
average screen presence.
In Maid in Manhattan, she
top-lines her fifth-straight film following starring roles in
The Cell, The Wedding Planner, Angel Eyes, and Enough. While
there’s no doubt that J-Lo is a star and possibly a good
actress, the fact remains that as a box office draw she’s no
Julia, Meg, or Reese, as none of her movies have made more
than $61 million at the box office (domestic) and she’s not a
potent international draw either. It’s probably not fair to
say that she has a lot riding on the release of Maid in
Manhattan, as U.S. interest in J-Lo seems insatiable at the
moment and she has two movies scheduled for release in 2003
(both with fiancé Ben Affleck). But the release of Maid in
Manhattan will prove an interesting test of her ability to
open a movie, and whether all the publicity and media
domination actually translates into box office dollars.
At first glance, it would appear
that she has a hit on her hands with Maid in Manhattan. Public
awareness of her as an entertainer has probably never been and
probably never will be higher. It’s the only romantic comedy
of the Christmas season and the PG-13 rating guarantees that
her younger fans will be able see the movie. And the plot is a
Cinderella story, quite similar to the Holy Grail of romantic
comedies, Pretty Woman. J-Lo was moderately successful in her
only other romantic comedy outing, The Wedding Planner, which
grossed just over $60 million in the United States. The lack
of a strong male co-star in Ralph Fiennes is not necessarily a
drawback, especially when you compare it with the success of
Reese Witherspoon’s Sweet Home Alabama earlier this year.
Advance buzz and early critical reaction seems decidedly
mixed, with no raves and no outright pans though it must be
stated that her core fans of young teen women is probably not
swayed by critical reaction to the movie. I’m not sure
critical reaction will be important at all given the lack of
other romantic comedies in the market place right now.
So all the ingredients are there
for a hit, but something still feels a little off to me. A
brief perusal of the initial reviews leads me to believe Maid
in Manhattan is an average romantic comedy, a nice way to kill
off a couple of hours during the holiday madness. J-Lo’s past
box-office track record certainly would lead one to believe
that she’s good for $50 - 60 million and maybe $70 million
tops, but no more than that. The movie certainly doesn’t look
to be the lightening in the bottle that was Pretty Woman and
for all her publicity, Lopez doesn’t have the “heat” of Reese
Witherspoon who drove Sweet Home Alabama to a $125 million
(and counting) domestic gross.
The media seems far more
fascinated with her than the average moviegoer, and I think
that will keep her from reaching the box-office heights of
Reese, Julia, Meg, or even Jodie. J-Lo’s sheer ambition and
appetite for stardom is breathtaking. No other female
celebrity other than Madonna has so single-mindedly pursued
fame and stardom, and one would have to argue that she’s been
slightly more successful than Madonna in that regard given her
relative success in movies. However, Madonna was a cultural
lightening rod who generated attention through controversy and
provocation. Nothing about J-Lo is controversial, especially
since she's not dating P. Diddy anymore. At this stage J-Lo is
famous for being J-Lo, not for being a provocateur or an
exceptionally talented artist.
In the end though, I think what
will keep J-Lo from being a huge box office draw and Maid in
Manhattan from being a huge hit (more than $75 million) on the
level of the romantic comedies of Reese, Meg, or Julia is the
fact that U.S. audiences like to discover their stars and not
have would-be stars crammed down their throats. Moviegoers
"discovered" Julia in Pretty Woman, Meg in When Harry Met
Sally, and Reese in Legally Blonde (Tom in Risky Business and
Brad in Thelma & Louise are just two examples from the
masculine perspective of movie stardom). All three women were
in unexpected hits that thrust them into the limelight and on
the path to stardom. I think that's why TV stars rarely become
huge box-office draws because the element of surprise is lost.
There's nothing surprising about
Jennifer Lopez at this stage of her career, as there's no
audience discovery; we know her too well. The Wedding Planner
was "manufactured" to be a hit and Maid in Manhattan looks to
be a by-the-books romantic comedy that offers audiences
nothing they haven't seen before. Until J-Lo does something
unexpected (like playing a femme fatale or making herself
unattractive) or decides to take a movie role that demands
more of her than her natural charisma, she will probably
remain more famous for being famous and not the movie star she
so longs to be which means she can be counted on to generate
$50 - 60 million in box office and decent home video revenue,
but nothing more.