But this
morning I got this
interview clip that at first felt phony,
but checking the source of the information
proved me wrong. Below is an interview
clip of which director Spike Jonze
elaborates on a new so-called huge script
idea Charlie Kaufman has written for him.
This is one of the best reads I've had in
terms of filmmaker interviews, so enjoy
Jonze's down-to-earth standpoint...
"While it’s more of a
hush-hush thing right now, what I can tell
you is that Charlie’s (Kaufman) got a
really ingenious idea brewing up; think
Malkovich with a slight touch of
Adaptation. It’s a really weird and
different concept, but our early
contestant for leading man is Jim Carrey.
Charlie and James met over a weekend at
Carrey’s cabin to discuss the specifics
and he’s (Carrey) literally blown away;
this is like nothing he’s ever heard of
before. Where our two films (Being John
Malkovich and Adaptation) were skewed to
more of an art-house, intellectual
audience, Charlie’s got a great idea that
will angle the demographic to more of a
universal edge. I think those who were
turned off by those two works are going to
be real surprised with this.
The only thing is that
Warner Bros. is hesitant if I can operate
such a production, as I haven’t done
anything to this scale. I mean, we’re
talking something that could be
blockbuster status. Charlie doesn’t ever
write material this mainstream; he aims
for a very specific audience that you
don’t find at your average multiplex. And
this is like a classic example of a cross
between mainstream and art-house; the
concept is so out there yet so very
creative, but has a twist of every-day
cinema to it. It’s hard to get my point
across without mentioning the plot, but I
could get in trouble if I do so.
But they (WB) sort of
want me on the project because they know I
can direct. It’s not self-glowing or
anything, as that’s pretty much the
situation. It’s one of those story ideas
where if you don’t have the ideal talent
handling the project, there’s just no
point in risking it all. They were
thinking about going to either John Woo or
Christopher Nolan, as both have a good
visual sense as the movie needs, but both
are swamped. But really, I don’t think
Charlie’s ideas concur with their
filmmaking motif. The script is like
Malkovich with about fifty times the
amount of fantasy to it, and heavily
requires the protagonist actor to be able
to…well, morph, if I can use that word.
It’s the type of role
that could either make an actor huge if
executed properly or if already famous
like Carrey, it’s just going to build
tremendously onto the current status of
his career. The movie is such a huge risk
being that we’re crossing two different
moviegoing territories (mainstream and
art-house), but if we can pull off the
film as wondrously adventurous and
fantasy-like as Charlie’s early ideas
appear, we’re talking about a film that
could change the way we look at cinema.
Visual effects and
acting wise, I know the new Matrix will
have a good shot at winning honors in that
field or at least as visuals go, but here
those two components are going to be so
trippy that it’s literally going to be
like no film we’ve seen before. I know
that comes off a little bias, but I’m
never been as confident about any idea
I’ve produced as I am with this. And the
thing is, budget wise it’s only going to
be roughly $30 million or so; but with the
technological techniques we can bring to
life here, god damn is all I have to say
(laughs).
And with $30 million,
Carrey’s gonna have to take a major cut in
the pay and he’s willing to take the
sacrifice, which already is just
mind-blowing. The role is going to be so
demanding both psychologically and
physically that it’s one of those few
times where such a high paid salary would
be worthy, but here it’s just not going to
be an option. Jim’s just a very good
sport, and if we can get this idea to go
through I think it’s going to be the role
that fans look back on thirty years from
now.
I’d hate to reveal
anything, but the script would carry such
a climactic twist to its formula that (M.
Night) Shyamalan is considering to
executive produce to give me a boost of
recommendation as director. And I don’t
know if you know Night, but he doesn’t
executive produce; he writes his material
and directs it, nothing else; well,
producing his stuff too. But in terms of
other filmmakers, he’s never offered such
a generous hand.
The thing that is
literally breathtaking is that studios
don’t force upon a hush-hush device for a
concept unless it’s truly of epic
proportion in either buzz or if it carries
a huge potential in success. And months
ago I was forced to sign a contract that I
wouldn’t speak about any relative details
regarding the plot; I was allowed to tease
and go around the path, but not walk
directly on it. It’s just a funny studio
device they live by in marketing, and it’s
all new to me. (laughs) I’m a guy who
barely made any money on Malkovich and
Adaptation and now they’re telling me that
I can’t tell anyone about this project or
the risk of being taken off (in
consideration) lingers.
I was making music
videos just some years ago and now I’m
under contract for a movie they believe
could be so big that it can’t go public
quite yet. It’s like you’re trying to wake
up from a dream that seems so obvious to
be one. Or even an April Fools joke that
just seems too good to be true, and in
this case, it is." |